Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- en:games:star_trek_armada_1:optimal_sensor_placement [2022-08-11-21-54] – [Optimal Sensor Placement] 7saturn
+++ en:games:star_trek_armada_1:optimal_sensor_placement [2022-08-11-21-56] (current) – 7saturn
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 {{ :en:games:star_trek_armada_1:sensor_minimum_required_with_optimal_redundancy_and_three_vacancies.png?direct |}}
-So this pattern is rather resilient against attacks but expensive to build. The placing is also not too straight forward: When moving 5 in one direction, 8.7 has to be moved in the perpendicular direction. But it is easier to use 5/8.5 grid tiles.
+So this pattern is rather resilient against attacks but expensive to build. The placing is also not too straight forward: When moving 5 in one direction, 8.7 has to be moved in the perpendicular direction. But it is easier to use 5/8.5 grid tiles. This wastes a little bit of the efficiency, but does not compromise the redundancy at all.
 ===== Simple Grid =====
 This shape simply uses square-shaped grid, with the vacancies filled with one station:
@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 {{ :en:games:star_trek_armada_1:sensor_simple_without_redundancy.png?direct |}}
-The enclosed area for this pattern is $4\times10^6$ and encloses $2$ stations on average. This makes the covered area per station $2\times10^6$. That's considerably better than the [[#Maximum Redundancy]] pattern with 1.57 stations more for the same area. The biggest problem here is, already one station missing leaves a gap:
+The enclosed area for this pattern is $4\times10^6$ and encloses $2$ stations on average. This makes the covered area per station $2\times10^6$. That's considerably better than the [[#Maximum Redundancy]] pattern with $1.57$ stations more for the same area. The biggest problem here is, already one station missing leaves a gap:
 {{ :en:games:star_trek_armada_1:sensor_simple_without_redundancy_and_with_vacancy.png?direct |}}